+40.6%
CRDO vs NCLH
-27.1%
+67.7%
-47.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NCLH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | +1.7% | -0.1% | +1.3% |
| 7D | -4.5% | -4.8% | +0.3% | -3.4% |
| 30D | -39.2% | -21.7% | -17.6% | -36.1% |
| 3M | -38.5% | -22.2% | -16.2% | -37.4% |
| 6M | +40.6% | -27.5% | +68.1% | +46.3% |
| All | +40.6% | -27.1% | +67.7% | +46.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NCLH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NCLH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NCLH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NCLH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling