+502.4%
CRDO vs MSTZ
-99.1%
+601.5%
-61.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | -3.8% | +5.4% | +1.0% |
| 7D | -4.5% | +17.0% | -21.5% | -1.5% |
| 30D | -39.2% | -61.8% | +22.6% | -46.9% |
| 3M | -38.5% | -54.6% | +16.1% | -42.1% |
| 6M | +40.6% | -59.3% | +99.8% | +38.0% |
| YTD | +13.2% | -74.6% | +87.8% | +11.8% |
| 1Y | +2.3% | -18.8% | +21.1% | +34.1% |
| All | +502.4% | -99.1% | +601.5% | +495.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling