+925.7%
CRDO vs M
+97.0%
+828.6%
-61.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | M | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.5% | -4.7% | +0.2% | -3.5% |
| 7D | -2.4% | -8.8% | +6.4% | -0.3% |
| 30D | -35.3% | -16.4% | -18.9% | -32.8% |
| 3M | -32.6% | -10.8% | -21.7% | -31.2% |
| 6M | +42.7% | +16.1% | +26.6% | +36.9% |
| YTD | +11.4% | -5.3% | +16.7% | +10.8% |
| 1Y | -2.2% | +24.9% | -27.1% | -9.4% |
| All | +925.7% | +97.0% | +828.6% | +694.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside M.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus M return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × M return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded M wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling