+1,298.7%
CRDO vs LNT
+34.6%
+1,264.1%
-62.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | 0.0% | +1.6% | +1.6% |
| 7D | -4.5% | -1.0% | -3.4% | -4.6% |
| 30D | -39.2% | -4.2% | -35.0% | -39.7% |
| 3M | -38.5% | -6.7% | -31.8% | -39.3% |
| 6M | +40.6% | -3.6% | +44.2% | +39.4% |
| YTD | +13.2% | +5.9% | +7.4% | +13.5% |
| 1Y | +2.3% | +7.3% | -5.0% | +2.6% |
| 3Y | +942.5% | +46.5% | +896.1% | +917.7% |
| All | +1,298.7% | +34.6% | +1,264.1% | +1,290.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling