+942.5%
CRDO vs LMT
+34.5%
+908.1%
-61.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LMT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | -1.1% | +2.8% | +1.5% |
| 7D | -4.5% | -0.2% | -4.3% | -4.5% |
| 30D | -39.2% | -13.1% | -26.2% | -40.1% |
| 3M | -38.5% | -3.9% | -34.6% | -38.3% |
| 6M | +40.6% | -18.3% | +58.8% | +39.0% |
| YTD | +13.2% | +10.3% | +2.9% | +17.3% |
| 1Y | +2.3% | +14.2% | -12.0% | +6.9% |
| 3Y | +942.5% | +35.0% | +907.6% | +1,077.6% |
| All | +942.5% | +34.5% | +908.1% | +1,077.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LMT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LMT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LMT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LMT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling