+1,364.1%
CRDO vs LII
+49.2%
+1,314.9%
-62.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LII | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.9% | +1.2% | +2.7% | +3.2% |
| 7D | -26.7% | -0.7% | -26.0% | -26.3% |
| 30D | -24.1% | -12.6% | -11.5% | -18.1% |
| 3M | -21.6% | -24.4% | +2.9% | -9.5% |
| 6M | +66.3% | -28.7% | +95.0% | +96.9% |
| YTD | +18.5% | -19.1% | +37.7% | +27.5% |
| 1Y | +27.3% | -29.7% | +57.0% | +49.1% |
| 3Y | +914.7% | +4.8% | +909.9% | +803.0% |
| All | +1,364.1% | +49.2% | +1,314.9% | +827.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LII.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LII return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LII return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LII wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling