+1,028.8%
CRDO vs LII
+35.0%
+993.8%
-62.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LII | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.9% | +1.1% | -7.1% | -6.5% |
| 7D | +9.1% | +2.9% | +6.2% | +7.5% |
| 30D | -26.6% | +0.9% | -27.5% | -28.0% |
| 3M | -50.6% | -15.5% | -35.0% | -46.3% |
| 6M | -30.6% | -30.2% | -0.3% | -17.5% |
| YTD | -8.6% | -26.8% | +18.2% | +2.7% |
| 1Y | -8.0% | -25.3% | +17.3% | +1.8% |
| 3Y | +704.3% | -7.8% | +712.1% | +662.5% |
| All | +1,028.8% | +35.0% | +993.8% | +647.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LII.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LII return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LII return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LII wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling