+942.5%
CRDO vs HLT
+99.0%
+843.5%
-61.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HLT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | 0.0% | +1.7% | +1.7% |
| 7D | -4.5% | -1.6% | -2.9% | -3.2% |
| 30D | -39.2% | -5.0% | -34.2% | -36.9% |
| 3M | -38.5% | -10.4% | -28.1% | -33.2% |
| 6M | +40.6% | +3.2% | +37.3% | +31.8% |
| YTD | +13.2% | +6.7% | +6.5% | +1.5% |
| 1Y | +2.3% | +10.3% | -8.0% | -13.2% |
| 3Y | +942.5% | +99.3% | +843.2% | +394.1% |
| All | +942.5% | +99.0% | +843.5% | +394.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HLT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HLT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HLT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HLT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling