+42.7%
CRDO vs GTLB
+94.7%
-51.9%
-47.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.5% | +2.1% | -6.6% | -4.4% |
| 7D | -2.4% | -4.1% | +1.7% | -2.6% |
| 30D | -35.3% | +12.3% | -47.6% | -34.8% |
| 3M | -32.6% | +65.9% | -98.5% | -32.4% |
| 6M | +42.7% | +104.0% | -61.3% | +31.2% |
| All | +42.7% | +94.7% | -51.9% | +31.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling