+1,339.9%
CRDO vs DXCM
-15.5%
+1,355.4%
-62.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | DXCM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | -3.8% | +2.2% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -18.8% | -6.2% | -12.6% | -17.5% |
| 30D | -32.9% | -0.3% | -32.6% | -32.9% |
| 3M | -24.5% | +10.3% | -34.9% | -27.0% |
| 6M | +52.7% | +24.1% | +28.6% | +42.3% |
| YTD | +16.6% | +27.4% | -10.8% | +7.3% |
| 1Y | +13.7% | +8.4% | +5.3% | +8.6% |
| 3Y | +959.0% | -19.0% | +978.0% | +915.0% |
| All | +1,339.9% | -15.5% | +1,355.4% | +1,098.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DXCM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DXCM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DXCM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DXCM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling