+928.1%
CRDO vs DOC
+22.7%
+905.4%
-61.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DOC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.9% | -1.8% | +5.7% | +4.2% |
| 7D | -26.7% | -1.5% | -25.2% | -26.6% |
| 30D | -24.1% | -4.8% | -19.3% | -23.6% |
| 3M | -21.6% | +6.9% | -28.5% | -23.5% |
| 6M | +66.3% | +20.7% | +45.6% | +57.3% |
| YTD | +18.5% | +34.1% | -15.6% | +9.7% |
| 1Y | +27.3% | +22.6% | +4.6% | +19.7% |
| All | +928.1% | +22.7% | +905.4% | +836.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DOC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DOC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DOC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DOC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling