+1,298.7%
CRDO vs ARES
+108.5%
+1,190.2%
-62.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ARES | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | +0.8% | +0.9% | +1.1% |
| 7D | -4.5% | -6.1% | +1.6% | +0.1% |
| 30D | -39.2% | -7.5% | -31.7% | -35.7% |
| 3M | -38.5% | +0.1% | -38.6% | -39.4% |
| 6M | +40.6% | +30.3% | +10.3% | +11.8% |
| YTD | +13.2% | -16.6% | +29.9% | +24.7% |
| 1Y | +2.3% | -26.1% | +28.4% | +22.9% |
| 3Y | +942.5% | +36.4% | +906.1% | +720.7% |
| All | +1,298.7% | +108.5% | +1,190.2% | +692.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARES.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARES return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARES return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARES wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling