+974.3%
CRDO vs ABCL
+103.9%
+870.5%
-61.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -3.4% | +3.5% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +1.6% | -2.7% | +4.4% | +2.3% |
| 30D | -30.0% | +18.3% | -48.3% | -33.2% |
| 3M | -28.3% | +108.5% | -136.8% | -43.0% |
| 6M | +44.8% | +213.9% | -169.1% | +2.2% |
| YTD | +16.7% | +223.1% | -206.4% | -19.6% |
| 1Y | +12.7% | +160.6% | -147.9% | -18.2% |
| All | +974.3% | +103.9% | +870.5% | +571.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling