+8.9%
CRCL vs ZTS
-55.9%
+64.8%
-80.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | +0.2% | +0.2% | +0.3% |
| 7D | -11.2% | -3.7% | -7.5% | -11.2% |
| 30D | +27.1% | -0.8% | +27.9% | +27.1% |
| 3M | +9.6% | -9.7% | +19.4% | +9.6% |
| 6M | -19.7% | -38.4% | +18.7% | -15.8% |
| YTD | +14.2% | -41.1% | +55.3% | +19.7% |
| 1Y | -32.2% | -50.6% | +18.4% | -34.2% |
| All | +8.9% | -55.9% | +64.8% | -20.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling