+8.9%
CRCL vs TNA
+113.7%
-104.8%
-80.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | TNA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | +1.1% | -0.8% | -0.4% |
| 7D | -11.2% | -7.3% | -4.0% | -6.8% |
| 30D | +27.1% | -14.2% | +41.3% | +40.1% |
| 3M | +9.6% | -4.6% | +14.2% | +12.1% |
| 6M | -19.7% | +36.9% | -56.6% | -36.7% |
| YTD | +14.2% | +42.5% | -28.3% | -13.3% |
| 1Y | -32.2% | +45.8% | -78.0% | -48.7% |
| All | +8.9% | +113.7% | -104.8% | -22.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TNA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TNA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TNA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TNA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling