-25.3%
CRCL vs PLD
+24.6%
-49.8%
-80.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | +0.1% | -2.6% | -2.6% |
| 7D | -8.4% | +1.3% | -9.7% | -8.9% |
| 30D | -21.8% | -1.4% | -20.4% | -21.4% |
| 3M | -17.5% | -8.2% | -9.3% | -14.7% |
| 6M | -50.9% | -8.0% | -42.9% | -49.4% |
| YTD | -21.6% | +3.2% | -24.7% | -23.3% |
| 1Y | -24.5% | +7.0% | -31.5% | -27.7% |
| All | -25.3% | +24.6% | -49.8% | -26.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling