+8.9%
CRCL vs NVT
+145.8%
-136.9%
-80.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NVT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | +4.6% | -4.3% | -1.7% |
| 7D | -11.2% | +4.1% | -15.3% | -12.9% |
| 30D | +27.1% | -5.1% | +32.2% | +29.5% |
| 3M | +9.6% | -1.2% | +10.8% | +8.2% |
| 6M | -19.7% | +46.6% | -66.3% | -33.7% |
| YTD | +14.2% | +60.0% | -45.7% | -8.6% |
| 1Y | -32.2% | +70.8% | -103.0% | -44.5% |
| All | +8.9% | +145.8% | -136.9% | +0.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling