-16.9%
CRCL vs NTAP
+87.9%
-104.8%
-54.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NTAP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.3% | -2.3% | -1.0% | -3.1% |
| 7D | +4.9% | +2.2% | +2.7% | +4.8% |
| 30D | +38.7% | -7.0% | +45.7% | +38.9% |
| 3M | +14.7% | +12.3% | +2.4% | +11.5% |
| 6M | -16.9% | +85.1% | -102.0% | -18.2% |
| All | -16.9% | +87.9% | -104.8% | -18.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTAP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTAP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTAP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTAP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling