-16.9%
CRCL vs MTB
+17.8%
-34.6%
-54.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | MTB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.3% | -0.2% | -3.1% | -3.4% |
| 7D | +4.9% | +1.1% | +3.8% | +5.5% |
| 30D | +38.7% | -4.6% | +43.3% | +33.8% |
| 3M | +14.7% | +6.3% | +8.4% | +20.2% |
| 6M | -16.9% | +15.6% | -32.5% | -8.5% |
| All | -16.9% | +17.8% | -34.6% | -8.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling