-18.4%
CRCL vs GLDM
+20.2%
-38.6%
-80.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | -0.8% | -1.5% | -1.8% |
| 7D | -6.4% | +4.7% | -11.1% | -9.3% |
| 30D | -16.0% | -0.9% | -15.2% | -15.3% |
| 3M | +7.3% | -4.3% | +11.6% | +11.7% |
| 6M | -44.3% | -13.4% | -30.9% | -40.3% |
| YTD | -14.4% | -5.8% | -8.6% | -1.9% |
| 1Y | -32.1% | +2.1% | -34.2% | -19.8% |
| All | -18.4% | +20.2% | -38.6% | +26.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling