+8.9%
CRCL vs FLNC
+103.5%
-94.6%
-80.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | +2.5% | -2.2% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -11.2% | -4.1% | -7.2% | -10.8% |
| 30D | +27.1% | -24.8% | +51.9% | +31.7% |
| 3M | +9.6% | -59.1% | +68.7% | +21.7% |
| 6M | -19.7% | -42.0% | +22.3% | -16.1% |
| YTD | +14.2% | -49.8% | +64.0% | +20.9% |
| 1Y | -32.2% | +43.1% | -75.3% | -29.5% |
| All | +8.9% | +103.5% | -94.6% | +53.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling