+8.5%
CRCL vs ENTG
+91.2%
-82.7%
-80.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.9% | -3.9% | +1.1% | -1.8% |
| 7D | -12.5% | +5.1% | -17.6% | -13.8% |
| 30D | +26.9% | -8.5% | +35.5% | +29.7% |
| 3M | +14.4% | +6.7% | +7.7% | +7.6% |
| 6M | -23.5% | +17.7% | -41.3% | -30.7% |
| YTD | +13.9% | +63.5% | -49.6% | -8.0% |
| 1Y | -20.6% | +73.6% | -94.1% | -31.5% |
| All | +8.5% | +91.2% | -82.7% | +23.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling