+11.7%
CRCL vs EMB
+10.4%
+1.3%
-80.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | EMB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.3% | -0.2% | -3.1% | -2.7% |
| 7D | +4.9% | 0.0% | +4.9% | +5.0% |
| 30D | +38.7% | -0.3% | +39.0% | +40.3% |
| 3M | +14.7% | -0.3% | +14.9% | +17.3% |
| 6M | -16.9% | +0.7% | -17.6% | -17.0% |
| YTD | +17.3% | +1.3% | +16.0% | +15.9% |
| 1Y | -21.2% | +4.7% | -25.9% | -17.0% |
| All | +11.7% | +10.4% | +1.3% | +130.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EMB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EMB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EMB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EMB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling