+8.9%
CRCL vs EAT
+23.1%
-14.2%
-80.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | -1.0% | +1.3% | +0.4% |
| 7D | -11.2% | -7.7% | -3.5% | -10.5% |
| 30D | +27.1% | -13.6% | +40.7% | +28.9% |
| 3M | +9.6% | +33.9% | -24.2% | +4.4% |
| 6M | -19.7% | +47.2% | -66.9% | -25.3% |
| YTD | +14.2% | +48.1% | -33.8% | +5.0% |
| 1Y | -32.2% | +33.7% | -65.9% | -25.1% |
| All | +8.9% | +23.1% | -14.2% | +38.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling