-39.2%
CRCL vs DECK
-10.2%
-28.9%
-54.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -8.7% | -1.5% | -7.2% | -8.2% |
| 7D | -13.1% | +6.0% | -19.2% | -14.7% |
| 30D | -17.4% | +7.4% | -24.9% | -19.2% |
| 3M | +9.8% | -11.7% | +21.4% | +10.0% |
| 6M | -39.2% | -11.0% | -28.2% | -39.7% |
| All | -39.2% | -10.2% | -28.9% | -39.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling