+11.7%
CRCL vs ARES
-17.0%
+28.7%
-80.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ARES | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.3% | -3.1% | -0.3% | -1.3% |
| 7D | +4.9% | -2.7% | +7.6% | +7.1% |
| 30D | +38.7% | -2.4% | +41.1% | +41.8% |
| 3M | +14.7% | +3.9% | +10.7% | +11.8% |
| 6M | -16.9% | +26.4% | -43.2% | -30.2% |
| YTD | +17.3% | -14.9% | +32.1% | +32.6% |
| 1Y | -21.2% | -20.4% | -0.8% | -4.2% |
| All | +11.7% | -17.0% | +28.7% | +51.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARES.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARES return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARES return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARES wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling