+22.6%
CRCL vs AMC
-22.1%
+44.7%
-80.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | AMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | +4.3% | -5.5% | -1.9% |
| 7D | +17.1% | +2.3% | +14.8% | +16.5% |
| 30D | +61.3% | -0.7% | +62.0% | +61.2% |
| 3M | +12.7% | +35.2% | -22.5% | +4.4% |
| 6M | -3.1% | +124.6% | -127.6% | -20.2% |
| YTD | +28.7% | +69.9% | -41.2% | +13.9% |
| 1Y | -13.1% | -2.6% | -10.6% | -4.7% |
| All | +22.6% | -22.1% | +44.7% | +46.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling