+15.6%
CRCL vs ALHC
-12.0%
+27.6%
-80.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.8% | -0.6% | -5.2% | -5.7% |
| 7D | +7.5% | -1.0% | +8.4% | +7.5% |
| 30D | +44.3% | -6.3% | +50.6% | +44.7% |
| 3M | +16.5% | -12.3% | +28.9% | +17.1% |
| 6M | -5.6% | -27.0% | +21.4% | -6.5% |
| YTD | +21.3% | -31.8% | +53.1% | +21.6% |
| 1Y | -14.5% | -17.0% | +2.5% | -18.3% |
| All | +15.6% | -12.0% | +27.6% | +13.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling