-17.7%
CPNG vs GLDM
+128.8%
-146.5%
-54.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -0.9% | -0.5% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -7.4% | -0.5% | -6.9% | -7.3% |
| 30D | -4.4% | +4.4% | -8.8% | -5.7% |
| 3M | -7.5% | -1.1% | -6.4% | -7.5% |
| 6M | -19.9% | -13.7% | -6.3% | -17.4% |
| YTD | -35.2% | +2.8% | -37.9% | -36.0% |
| 1Y | -46.8% | +24.8% | -71.6% | -51.0% |
| All | -17.7% | +128.8% | -146.5% | -47.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling