-22.4%
CPNG vs EAT
+585.9%
-608.3%
-56.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -0.3% | -0.3% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -5.4% | -6.2% | +0.8% | -4.6% |
| 30D | -11.1% | -3.0% | -8.1% | -10.9% |
| 3M | -3.0% | +45.6% | -48.6% | -8.8% |
| 6M | -23.5% | +53.5% | -77.1% | -28.9% |
| YTD | -37.8% | +49.6% | -87.4% | -42.1% |
| 1Y | -54.3% | +38.9% | -93.2% | -57.2% |
| All | -22.4% | +585.9% | -608.3% | -39.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling