-17.4%
CPNG vs AMC
-67.9%
+50.4%
-54.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | +4.3% | -5.7% | -1.7% |
| 7D | -7.4% | +2.3% | -9.8% | -7.6% |
| 30D | -4.4% | -0.7% | -3.7% | -4.5% |
| 3M | -7.5% | +35.2% | -42.7% | -10.0% |
| 6M | -19.9% | +124.6% | -144.5% | -24.4% |
| YTD | -35.2% | +69.9% | -105.1% | -38.1% |
| 1Y | -46.8% | -2.6% | -44.2% | -48.2% |
| All | -17.4% | -67.9% | +50.4% | -13.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling