+28.9%
CP vs EPAM
-31.1%
+59.9%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | +20.6% | -21.3% | -2.5% |
| 7D | +6.1% | +23.0% | -16.9% | +4.0% |
| 30D | +9.8% | +51.6% | -41.8% | +5.5% |
| 3M | +2.7% | +50.8% | -48.1% | -1.5% |
| 6M | +12.8% | +51.1% | -38.4% | +7.9% |
| YTD | +28.2% | -19.1% | +47.3% | +30.5% |
| 1Y | +34.1% | +3.0% | +31.2% | +31.9% |
| All | +28.9% | -31.1% | +59.9% | +24.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling