+68.0%
COST vs WFC
+132.5%
-64.4%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | WFC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -0.2% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -2.5% | +0.3% | -2.8% | -2.5% |
| 30D | -4.4% | +2.3% | -6.7% | -4.7% |
| 3M | -8.1% | +9.8% | -17.8% | -9.1% |
| 6M | -9.2% | +15.6% | -24.8% | -10.9% |
| YTD | +5.1% | -2.4% | +7.5% | +5.4% |
| 1Y | -5.1% | +13.8% | -18.9% | -7.0% |
| All | +68.0% | +132.5% | -64.4% | +47.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside WFC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus WFC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × WFC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded WFC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling