+26.7%
COST vs UMAC
+508.0%
-481.3%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -6.4% | +5.6% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -2.8% | +3.3% | -6.1% | -2.8% |
| 30D | -5.3% | -10.4% | +5.1% | -5.3% |
| 3M | -6.7% | +1.8% | -8.4% | -6.7% |
| 6M | -9.9% | +40.7% | -50.7% | -10.2% |
| YTD | +5.1% | +90.9% | -85.8% | +4.4% |
| 1Y | -7.3% | +151.8% | -159.0% | -8.3% |
| All | +26.7% | +508.0% | -481.3% | +21.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling