+68.0%
COST vs TXT
+4.6%
+63.4%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -0.9% | +0.8% | +0.1% |
| 7D | -2.5% | -0.2% | -2.3% | -2.5% |
| 30D | -4.4% | -10.2% | +5.8% | -3.0% |
| 3M | -8.1% | -13.3% | +5.2% | -6.4% |
| 6M | -9.2% | -14.4% | +5.1% | -7.6% |
| YTD | +5.1% | -9.1% | +14.2% | +5.8% |
| 1Y | -5.1% | -2.2% | -2.9% | -5.9% |
| All | +68.0% | +4.6% | +63.4% | +58.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling