+96.9%
COST vs TMF
-29.8%
+126.7%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TMF | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | +0.1% | +1.1% | +1.2% |
| 7D | +2.5% | +0.6% | +1.9% | +2.4% |
| 30D | +12.8% | +16.3% | -3.6% | +12.1% |
| 3M | +12.7% | -2.7% | +15.3% | +12.7% |
| 6M | +6.0% | -13.2% | +19.2% | +6.5% |
| YTD | +24.4% | -16.7% | +41.0% | +25.1% |
| 1Y | +16.2% | -22.7% | +39.0% | +17.2% |
| 3Y | +96.9% | -26.1% | +123.0% | +97.0% |
| All | +96.9% | -29.8% | +126.7% | +97.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TMF.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TMF return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TMF return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TMF wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling