+68.1%
COST vs TFC
+91.9%
-23.8%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TFC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -0.8% | 0.0% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -2.8% | -1.3% | -1.5% | -2.6% |
| 30D | -5.3% | -2.3% | -2.9% | -5.0% |
| 3M | -6.7% | +2.5% | -9.1% | -7.0% |
| 6M | -9.9% | +9.5% | -19.4% | -11.2% |
| YTD | +5.1% | +5.1% | +0.1% | +4.0% |
| 1Y | -7.3% | +15.5% | -22.8% | -9.7% |
| All | +68.1% | +91.9% | -23.8% | +50.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TFC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TFC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TFC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TFC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling