+68.5%
COST vs PPG
-17.4%
+85.8%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PPG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | +0.4% | -0.2% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -1.2% | -6.2% | +5.0% | -0.4% |
| 30D | -4.7% | -7.9% | +3.2% | -3.8% |
| 3M | -7.1% | -10.2% | +3.1% | -6.1% |
| 6M | -8.5% | +2.7% | -11.2% | -9.5% |
| YTD | +5.4% | +4.9% | +0.5% | +3.6% |
| 1Y | -5.6% | -3.2% | -2.4% | -5.9% |
| 3Y | +68.5% | -17.0% | +85.5% | +66.9% |
| All | +68.5% | -17.4% | +85.8% | +66.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PPG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PPG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PPG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PPG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling