+107.7%
COST vs NVS
+92.9%
+14.8%
-31.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | NVS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | -0.2% | +0.5% | +0.3% |
| 7D | -1.2% | -14.3% | +13.1% | +1.9% |
| 30D | -4.7% | -10.0% | +5.2% | -2.9% |
| 3M | -7.1% | -10.9% | +3.8% | -5.2% |
| 6M | -8.5% | -12.0% | +3.4% | -6.5% |
| YTD | +5.4% | +2.5% | +2.9% | +3.8% |
| 1Y | -5.6% | +10.7% | -16.3% | -8.9% |
| 3Y | +68.5% | +53.3% | +15.2% | +47.6% |
| All | +107.7% | +92.9% | +14.8% | +68.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling