+68.5%
COST vs NRG
+203.5%
-135.0%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NRG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | +1.6% | -1.4% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -1.2% | -4.7% | +3.5% | -1.0% |
| 30D | -4.7% | -6.0% | +1.2% | -4.5% |
| 3M | -7.1% | -8.0% | +0.8% | -7.1% |
| 6M | -8.5% | -23.2% | +14.6% | -7.6% |
| YTD | +5.4% | -28.1% | +33.4% | +6.8% |
| 1Y | -5.6% | -27.3% | +21.6% | -4.8% |
| 3Y | +68.5% | +208.7% | -140.2% | +31.3% |
| All | +68.5% | +203.5% | -135.0% | +31.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NRG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NRG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NRG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NRG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling