+73.7%
COST vs LSCC
+24.1%
+49.6%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | +2.0% | -3.0% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -3.1% | +1.3% | -4.5% | -3.2% |
| 30D | -2.8% | -9.7% | +6.9% | -2.5% |
| 3M | -5.7% | -23.7% | +18.0% | -4.9% |
| 6M | -8.8% | +26.5% | -35.2% | -11.0% |
| YTD | +6.7% | +57.5% | -50.9% | +2.1% |
| 1Y | -3.6% | +75.7% | -79.3% | -8.9% |
| All | +73.7% | +24.1% | +49.6% | +64.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling