-9.2%
COST vs LHX
-31.5%
+22.2%
-17.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | LHX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -0.8% | +0.8% | +0.1% |
| 7D | -2.5% | -4.8% | +2.3% | -2.0% |
| 30D | -4.4% | -12.7% | +8.3% | -3.0% |
| 3M | -8.1% | -17.6% | +9.5% | -6.2% |
| 6M | -9.2% | -30.7% | +21.5% | -6.6% |
| All | -9.2% | -31.5% | +22.2% | -6.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LHX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LHX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LHX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LHX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling