+68.5%
COST vs IEMG
+83.7%
-15.2%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | IEMG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | +1.2% | -0.9% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -1.2% | -1.3% | +0.1% | -1.1% |
| 30D | -4.7% | +1.9% | -6.6% | -4.9% |
| 3M | -7.1% | +1.4% | -8.5% | -7.3% |
| 6M | -8.5% | +15.2% | -23.7% | -11.7% |
| YTD | +5.4% | +23.8% | -18.4% | -0.7% |
| 1Y | -5.6% | +30.7% | -36.3% | -12.8% |
| 3Y | +68.5% | +83.3% | -14.8% | +31.1% |
| All | +68.5% | +83.7% | -15.2% | +31.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IEMG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IEMG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IEMG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IEMG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling