+68.5%
COST vs GM
+166.7%
-98.2%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | -0.6% | +0.8% | +0.3% |
| 7D | -1.2% | -2.4% | +1.2% | -1.1% |
| 30D | -4.7% | -1.1% | -3.6% | -4.7% |
| 3M | -7.1% | +6.1% | -13.2% | -7.5% |
| 6M | -8.5% | +15.0% | -23.5% | -9.4% |
| YTD | +5.4% | +6.0% | -0.6% | +4.9% |
| 1Y | -5.6% | +47.1% | -52.7% | -8.6% |
| 3Y | +68.5% | +170.5% | -102.0% | +54.6% |
| All | +68.5% | +166.7% | -98.2% | +54.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling