+71.8%
COST vs FROG
+202.6%
-130.8%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FROG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -1.0% | +0.4% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -3.2% | -5.5% | +2.3% | -3.1% |
| 30D | -4.0% | -3.1% | -0.9% | -4.0% |
| 3M | -6.5% | +1.2% | -7.7% | -6.5% |
| 6M | -8.5% | +113.7% | -122.2% | -10.2% |
| YTD | +6.0% | +38.9% | -32.8% | +5.3% |
| 1Y | -5.8% | +72.0% | -77.8% | -7.4% |
| 3Y | +71.8% | +217.1% | -145.3% | +62.1% |
| All | +71.8% | +202.6% | -130.8% | +62.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FROG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FROG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FROG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FROG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling