+96.5%
COST vs EMB
+30.1%
+66.4%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EMB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | -0.8% | +1.2% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +2.5% | -0.7% | +3.2% | +2.9% |
| 30D | +14.6% | +0.5% | +14.1% | +14.2% |
| 3M | +15.2% | -2.5% | +17.7% | +16.8% |
| 6M | +7.2% | -2.0% | +9.2% | +8.3% |
| YTD | +27.4% | -0.9% | +28.3% | +27.7% |
| 1Y | +20.2% | -0.3% | +20.5% | +19.9% |
| All | +96.5% | +30.1% | +66.4% | +75.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EMB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EMB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EMB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EMB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling