+159.2%
COST vs ABCL
-81.3%
+240.4%
-31.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -1.2% | +0.2% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -3.1% | +0.7% | -3.8% | -3.2% |
| 30D | -2.8% | +93.1% | -95.9% | -4.2% |
| 3M | -5.7% | +79.4% | -85.1% | -7.0% |
| 6M | -8.8% | +214.9% | -223.6% | -11.6% |
| YTD | +6.7% | +234.2% | -227.5% | +3.0% |
| 1Y | -3.6% | +174.8% | -178.4% | -6.7% |
| 3Y | +75.1% | +104.5% | -29.4% | +68.9% |
| 5Y | +108.9% | -39.0% | +147.9% | +105.4% |
| All | +159.2% | -81.3% | +240.4% | +154.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling