+207.2%
COMP vs MTB
+109.6%
+97.5%
-50.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | -0.1% | +0.6% | +0.6% |
| 7D | +1.4% | +1.7% | -0.4% | +0.2% |
| 30D | -13.3% | -4.2% | -9.1% | -10.6% |
| 3M | +41.1% | +8.9% | +32.3% | +32.7% |
| 6M | +17.2% | +10.9% | +6.3% | +9.2% |
| YTD | +5.2% | +21.5% | -16.3% | -7.3% |
| 1Y | +18.9% | +21.9% | -3.0% | +4.3% |
| All | +207.2% | +109.6% | +97.5% | +54.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling