+9.0%
CNQ vs GTLB
+100.6%
-91.6%
-21.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -0.7% | +0.1% | -0.6% |
| 7D | +0.1% | -5.7% | +5.8% | -0.2% |
| 30D | +6.2% | +15.1% | -8.9% | +7.0% |
| 3M | +12.4% | +65.5% | -53.1% | +15.6% |
| 6M | +9.0% | +102.9% | -93.9% | +11.4% |
| All | +9.0% | +100.6% | -91.6% | +11.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling