+81.8%
CNQ vs GLDM
+127.4%
-45.6%
-35.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | +0.9% | 0.0% | +0.7% |
| 7D | -0.9% | +0.2% | -1.0% | -0.9% |
| 30D | +8.7% | +0.3% | +8.4% | +8.5% |
| 3M | +15.8% | +3.3% | +12.5% | +14.9% |
| 6M | +13.3% | -14.5% | +27.7% | +17.6% |
| YTD | +54.7% | +1.9% | +52.8% | +50.6% |
| 1Y | +69.5% | +21.1% | +48.4% | +52.1% |
| All | +81.8% | +127.4% | -45.6% | +9.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling