+59.3%
CNP vs UMAC
+195.7%
-136.5%
-18.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | -6.5% | +6.4% | -0.1% |
| 7D | +2.5% | +10.1% | -7.7% | +2.4% |
| 30D | +4.0% | -39.1% | +43.2% | +4.2% |
| 3M | +1.6% | -56.2% | +57.9% | +1.9% |
| 6M | -1.7% | -16.2% | +14.5% | -2.0% |
| YTD | +8.6% | -7.1% | +15.8% | +8.0% |
| 1Y | +5.8% | +10.3% | -4.4% | +5.0% |
| All | +59.3% | +195.7% | -136.5% | +51.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling